So, David Moyes is sacked after a mere 10 months in charge
of Manchester United.
I’ve been listening to BBC
Radio Five Live all morning and most people seem to support the decision. Manchester United supporters have, in the
main, been scathing about the fact that their team is unlikely to finish in the
top four, as is it’s divine right. The
football has been boring – it’s not the way we play. And the tactics? Well!
Even worse has been ‘The Big Club’ card. Moyes might have been okay for a little club
like Everton, went the mantra, but he was out of his depth at the biggest club
in the world. I don’t know how more
patronising some people could have been.
Apart from the spiky broadcaster Terry Christian, there was
little criticism of the Glaser family whose debt fuelled purchase of the club
has seen £800m spirited away to meet interest payments.
United’s decline is entirely down to David Moyes. He had to go?
This outsider suggests he did fail but not in the ways
described by some.
Since the new owners came in, Manchester United are no longer
big spenders and their outlay is similar to that of Stoke
City. In this final season Sir Alex Ferguson created
a near miracle winning the league with an ageing and declining team. And a team
that had not enjoyed much in the way of spending on it.
Moyes had a shopping list of players last summer but the new
CEO Ed Woodward failed to sign any of them, apart from Fellaini for a grossly
inflated £27m.
The signs of decline, noticeable under Sir Alex, were writ
large under Moyes and it was obvious long before today that he would not be
manager for the long term.
In the most crass way possible, ‘sources close to the club’
started briefing journalists that Moyes was to be axed and these rumours were
not emphatically denied by the owners.
(In politics, ‘sources close to the minister’ are usually ministers
themselves, so draw your own conclusions as to who these sources were.)
And now he’s gone and the airwaves are clogged up with
chatter and prattle.
Moyes was a cheap option, as he had proved at Everton over a
very long period of time but they didn’t give him long enough to see if he
could do it at Old Trafford.
This was a sacking about money and the fear of having less
of it by owners who run the club as a cash cow.
I cannot see the new manager being handed a fortune to
revamp the squad but even if he was what would it prove? It certainly wouldn’t guarantee anything,
that’s for sure.
So many of the fans seem not to look beyond what happens on
the pitch. That’s normal at most
clubs. But what happens in the boardroom
does directly impact on everything that happens at the club.
And what’s happening with the board at Manchester United is
why things are going wrong on the pitch.
I can understand, from personal experience, why it’s easier
to just watch the football and ignore everything that goes on off the pitch but
if you do that you have to accept you have less right to criticise what happens
on it.